By Sonny Zulhuda
Talk about the Information Age has filled many seminars, newspapers, books, web-pages, blogs, etc. But has it invited law students and law academia too? Have our students be adequately equipped by the understanding (conceptually, technically and so on) of what Information Age is, and how it challenges the notion of law taught in law schools? These are the questions that preoccupy many legal minds concerned of legal education.
Information Age is about the change, not only on gadgets, but also on the way we live as well as change of perspectives. For legal fraternities (i.e. lawyers, attorneys, judges and legal academia), it is critical to acknowledge this change, and not leaving it only to the hands of computer scientists. This is because the Information Age is a discourse of a cross-disciplinary realm. No less than information scientists, engineers, lawyers, accountants, sociologists, political scientists and business people are all concerned. They could even find themselves incapacitated if they choose to work separately. In the word of Boyle, this is called the collapse of disciplinary boundaries.
The above forms the background of my paper in the international seminar on Cyberlaw soon to be organised by the Faculty of Law, Islamic University of Sultan Agung (UNISSULA), Semarang, Indonesia on Wednesday, 26th October 2011. Hopefully this can invite a fruitful discussion among the faculty members and the seminar attendees.
The paper basically hypothesizes that in order to capably address legal issues and challenges in future, our legal education should be re-looked at and reformed. The Information Age environment should become an integral consideration in learning law (regardless the area; commercial, civil, criminal, constitutional, administrative, etc.). It argues not only for the introduction of cyber law in the law syllabus, but also the integration of the issues and discussion with other major and disciplines. On top of that, we can borrow Prof Palfrey’s thesis on ‘digital native‘ and ‘digital migrant’ so as to allow law to improve and deliver in the future.

In my last post I made note about why banks should or must care to protect the personal data with them. In this post I just want to put that note in real perspective, learning from real cases and incidents involving major banks in the world.
“The Starfish and the Spider”, or so we were told about 
Nope, this is not (yet) a ready paper. It’s an ongoing research that I am now conducting, funded by an internal research grant. It takes as the background the revolutionary growth of the information and communications technology and its use in the storing, processing and disseminating personal information.
This is my latest paper that I recently presented in the 1st International Conference on International Relations and Development (
Among the first question people would ask about Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) 2010 is “whether or not this Act applies to me?” or, if one could answer it in affirmative, “in what why the Act implicates me?”
Now everyone can “fly”! Yes we know that. But when you fly, will your personal information fly away in the sky? That, not everyone knows. This is the simple question that makes the backdrop of my recent paper, to be presented in Singapore’s International Conference of Social Science and Humanities (


